Parentof / Impact
Impact & evidenceA decade of learning.
Impact you can examine.
Built on 400 million learning data points and 50,000+ longitudinal users over a decade, Parentof’s platform is evaluated through focused proofs of concept. Explore what improved, what each study supports, and the evidence behind it.
The data behind the intelligenceA decade of learning.
A decade of learning.
A foundation for impact.
Parentof’s ARRC Engine draws on learning and behavioral data, longitudinal histories, and expert-curated developmental knowledge.
Company-reported platform data. The repository was built over a decade; this does not imply every user has ten years of follow-up. The proofs of concept below use their own study samples to evaluate specific outcomes.
7 impact records
AI-enabled interventions for sustained attention
124.3%
What improved / what was established
Expert-recorded sustained attention increased by an average of 124.3% after three months in 85 children.
What the findings support
Initial evidence that AI-guided, expert-delivered personalized activities can support sustained attention.
85 children · 3 months
Explore the impact ↗Digital attention training: a second pilot
7 completers
What improved / what was established
The second pilot found descriptive improvements in several task measures, with a statistically significant change in mental rotation.
What the findings support
Feasibility of combined digital training and coaching, with exploratory signals to investigate in larger trials.
9 enrolled / 7 completed · 4 weeks
Explore the impact ↗Personalized interventions for drawing skills
32.3%
What improved / what was established
Combined developmental activities and drawing practice produced 32.3% growth, versus 23.8% with practice alone.
What the findings support
Early evidence for pairing ability development with corrective practice in learning to draw.
15 children / 3 groups · Four intervention days per drawing cycle
Explore the impact ↗Personalized interventions for handwriting legibility
22%
What improved / what was established
Legibility improved by 22% in the combined group, compared with 11% for practice alone and 3% for developmental activities alone.
What the findings support
Early evidence that ability development and handwriting practice can complement each other.
14 children / 3 groups · 6 weeks
Explore the impact ↗Personalized activities for anger management
60%
What improved / what was established
Parent-reported anger episodes lasting more than ten minutes decreased by 60% over three months.
What the findings support
Initial evidence that tailored, expert-delivered developmental activities may support emotional regulation.
30 children · 3 months
Explore the impact ↗Assessment model: NIMHANS letter, 2017
2017
What improved / what was established
The 2017 NIMHANS review supported the model’s use for parental developmental reporting and guidance.
What the findings support
Model review supporting the assessment and reporting foundations of ARC / ARRC.
265 exploratory / 130 face validity · Letter dated 6 March 2017
Explore the impact ↗ARRC Engine vs. manual expert recommendations
<20 sec
What improved / what was established
Under 20 seconds vs. two days in the manual workflow evaluated; 30+ parameters vs. 3–4.
What the findings support
Personalized activity recommendations across frequency, intensity, speed and time in this study.
16 children · 13 July 2022
Explore the benchmark ↗No matching impact studies. Try another topic or choose All impact.
Explore study designs, participant counts, measured outcomes, and limitations. These are exploratory studies and model reviews; peer-review status is identified where established. Full whitepapers are available by request.
Every child has potential.
Let’s build what comes next.
For schools, families, researchers, and learning partners.